Publication Ethics
Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement
The Yemen Journal of Medicine is committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity, transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct throughout the publication process, ensuring the quality and credibility of published scientific research. The followings are the key ethical frameworks adopted by the Journal:
|
Organization |
Role in Publication Ethics |
|
Provides guidance on publication ethics, misconduct management, retractions, and editorial best practices. |
|
|
Establishes recommendations for manuscript preparation, authorship, conflicts of interest, and reporting standards. |
|
|
Promotes editorial independence, ethical publishing practices, and high standards in medical journal publishing. |
Our publishing activities are guided by the following core ethical values:
|
Ethical Principle |
Requirements and Responsibilities |
|
Editors’ responsibility |
Ensure fair, unbiased, and timely peer review. Evaluate manuscripts based on academic merit only. Maintain confidentiality, avoid conflicts of interest, and address suspected misconduct. |
|
Reviewers’ responsibility |
Provide objective and constructive reviews. Maintain confidentiality, avoid using unpublished information, identify uncited relevant work, report ethical concerns, and decline reviews when unqualified. |
|
Authors’ responsibility |
Authors are accountable for the integrity, accuracy, and reliability of their work, including data collection, analysis, and reporting. They must promptly address and correct any concerns regarding their published work. |
|
Authorship Requirements |
All authors and co-authors must meet recognized authorship criteria and receive appropriate credit. Authors should clearly describe their individual contributions to the manuscript. |
|
Originality and Plagiarism |
Submitted manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere. Any use of others’ work, ideas, or words must be properly cited or quoted. |
|
Data Availability and Citation |
Authors may be required to provide raw research data for editorial review and should be prepared to make data publicly available when appropriate. Data sources must be properly cited in the reference list. |
|
Acknowledgment of Sources |
All contributions, assistance, funding sources, and relevant works of others must be appropriately acknowledged in the manuscript. |
|
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure |
Authors must disclose any financial, personal, institutional, or professional relationships that could influence or appear to influence the research or its interpretation. |
|
Reporting Standards |
Research reports must provide an accurate, transparent, and objective description of methods, findings, and significance, without fabrication, falsification, or misleading statements. |
|
Human Subject Protection |
Studies involving human participants must include a statement confirming compliance with ethical standards and applicable regulations. |
|
Animal Welfare Compliance |
Research involving animals must adhere to institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals, with appropriate ethical statements included. |
|
Research Ethics Approval |
Research studies must obtain approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or equivalent ethics committee. Clinical trials should be registered according to national and international requirements. |
|
Publishing Ethics Standards |
The journal follows international best-practice guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) to ensure ethical, transparent, and responsible scientific publishing. |
|
Ethical misconduct |
Includes plagiarism, data fabrication/falsification, duplicate publication, inappropriate authorship, and citation manipulation. Actions may include manuscript rejection, article retraction, and institutional notification. |
|
Correction and retraction |
Significant post-publication errors or ethical issues may lead to corrections or retractions. Retraction notices are clearly marked and publicly available. |
Our steadfast adherence to these ethical principles highlights our commitment to upholding the highest standards of integrity and quality in scientific publishing at the Yemen Journal of Medicine.
It is not uncommon for errors to appear in published manuscripts, which may stem from either author oversights (corrigendom) or mistakes made by the journal (erratum). Following acceptance for publication, and in order to reduce errors, the Yemen Journal of Medicine (YJM) provides authors with two opportunities to review their article prior to publication: one after the article has been edited and the second during the galley proof revision.
Once the manuscript is published, any additional corrections due to authors' mistakes must be submitted as a "Correction" in a subsequent issue, which will incur a fee (25-50 $).
Errors that are significant enough to undermine a paper's results and conclusions may necessitate retraction, which signifies the official removal or invalidation of a published research paper, typically due to flawed data, unreliable conclusions, or instances of ethical misconduct. The retraction of a manuscript necessitates the consent of a minimum of three members of the editorial board in conjunction with the chief editor. The entire procedure will adhere to the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
