Author Instruction
All submitted manuscripts should contain original work neither published previously nor under consideration for publication elsewhere. Articles from any part of the world are accepted provided submitted in English language only. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission. Moreover, authors should check for Plagiarism in their Article title and work prior to proceeding with submission. Failure to follow these two steps may result in papers being delayed or rejected. All parts of the manuscript should be typewritten in “Times New Roman font” using a font size of 12, double-spaced, with margins of at least one inch on all sides. Pages should be consecutively numbered at the bottom, beginning with the title page.
Preparation of a research paper before submission depends on the type of the manuscript.
1. Types of Manuscripts:
|
Manuscript Type |
Description |
Structure / Main Sections |
Word Limit* |
References |
Figures/Tables |
|
Original Article |
a primary source in which authors report the findings of a novel study, experiment, or observation they personally conducted |
Structured Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures |
Up to 4,000 |
Up to 70 |
As needed |
|
Review Article |
Critical evaluation and synthesis of published literature by experts. |
Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Review Sections, Discussion, Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures |
Up to 4,000 |
Up to 150 |
As needed |
|
Systematic Review & Meta-analysis |
A systematic review is a structured, reproducible method to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all available research on a specific topic to minimize bias. A meta-analysis is the statistical process of pooling and combining the numerical data from multiple studies within that review into a single, comprehensive result. |
Structured Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures |
Up to 4,000 |
Up to 150 |
As needed |
|
Short Communication |
Short communications are ideal for sharing exciting findings, preliminary data, or studies that may not contain sufficient information to warrant a full paper. |
Structured Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures |
Up to 2,500 |
Up to 40 |
Maximum 5 tables and/or figures |
|
Case Report |
New, unusual, or clinically significant case. |
Unstructured Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Case Report, Discussion, References |
Up to 1,500 |
Up to 20 |
As needed |
|
Case Series |
Series of 3–6 cases involving the same disease process. |
Unstructured Abstract, Introduction, Case Reports, Discussion, Conclusion, References, Tables, Figures |
Up to 2,000 |
Up to 20 |
As needed |
|
Letter to the Editor |
Discussion of published articles or brief original observations. |
No Abstract; continuous text, references, tables, figures |
Up to 1,500 |
Up to 15 |
Maximum 2 figures/tables |
|
Clinical Image |
Educational visual presentation of a medically relevant finding. |
No Abstract; continuous text, Learning Points, Figure Legends, References |
Description ≤500 words |
Up to 5 |
Maximum 5 figures |
|
Editorial |
Invited commentary by editors or guest editors on relevant topics. |
No Abstract |
Up to 2,000 |
Up to 10 |
As needed |
|
Perspective |
Opinion piece on emerging, controversial, or rapidly evolving medical issues. |
No Abstract |
Up to 1,500 |
Up to 15 |
As needed |
|
Case-based Review |
Case presentation integrated with a systematic literature review. |
Unstructured Abstract, Introduction, Search Strategy, Case Presentation, Literature Review, Discussion, Conclusion, references, tables, figures |
Up to 3,500 |
~100 |
As needed |
|
Book Review |
Critical evaluation and analysis of a book. |
No Abstract |
Up to 1,000 |
~5 |
One figure (book cover) |
|
Spot the Diagnosis |
Educational image-based diagnostic challenge with MCQ. |
No Abstract; Question, Answer, Explanation |
Up to 500 |
Up to 5 |
Clinical image(s) |
|
Commentary |
Author perspectives, opinions, or reflections on a topic. |
Flexible format; no conventional IMRAD structure required |
Variable |
Variable |
As appropriate |
|
Pioneers of Medicine |
Biographical articles highlighting influential medical pioneers and their contributions. |
No Abstract |
Variable |
As appropriate |
As appropriate |
2. Reporting Guidelines for Specific Study Designs:
|
Initiative |
Type of study |
Source |
|
CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) |
Randomized controlled trials |
|
|
STAndards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD) |
Studies of diagnostic accuracy |
|
|
Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) |
Meta-analyses of observational studies |
|
|
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) |
Systematic reviews/ Meta-analyses of RCT |
|
|
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) |
Observational studies in epidemiology |
3. Author Disclosure Statement
|
Section |
Requirements |
Information to be Provided |
|
Authors’ Contributions |
The contribution of each author must be clearly described. All authors should meet authorship criteria by making substantial contributions to: (1) the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (2) drafting the manuscript or critically revising it for important intellectual content; and (3) final approval of the version to be published. |
Specify the role of each author (e.g., study conception, data collection, statistical analysis, manuscript drafting, critical revision, final approval). Note that participation solely in funding acquisition, data collection, or general supervision does not qualify for authorship. |
|
Source of Funding |
Authors must disclose all sources of financial support received for the research, manuscript preparation, or publication process. |
Provide the name of the funding agency, grant number (if applicable), and the role of the funder in the study. If no funding was received, state: “This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.” |
|
Conflict of Interest |
Authors must declare any financial, personal, academic, or professional relationships that could influence or be perceived to influence the work. |
Provide a detailed declaration of any potential conflicts of interest. If no conflicts exist, state: “No conflict of interest associated with this work.” |
4. References:
|
Reference Type |
Format Requirements |
Example |
|
In-text Citation |
References should be numbered consecutively in the order of first appearance in the text. Use Arabic numerals enclosed in square brackets after punctuation marks. |
The dosage is established based on the dialysate flow rate and the ultrafiltration rate to maintain fluid balance. [18] |
|
References in Tables/Figures |
References cited only in tables or figure legends should be numbered according to the sequence established by their first mention in the text. |
Number assigned according to first citation of the table or figure in the manuscript. |
|
Journal Title Format |
Use abbreviated journal titles according to Index Medicus. For non-indexed journals, use the full journal title. |
Yemen J Med |
|
Standard Journal Article (≤6 Authors) |
List all authors. Include article title, journal title, year, volume(issue), page range, and DOI (if available). |
Keshri R, Chaubey D, Maurya C, Kumar V, Sharma SC, Rahul SK. Transverse testicular ectopia with persistent mullerian duct syndrome: A case series. Yemen J Med. 2024;3(3):265–268. http://doi.org/10.18231/j.yjom.2024.031 |
|
Journal Article (>6 Authors) |
List first six authors followed by et al. Include DOI when available. |
Habas E, Habas A, Rayani A, Farfar K, Habas E, Alfitori J, et al. Updated review on malignancy-associated venous thromboembolism. Yemen J Med. 2024;3(1):4–20. https://doi.org/10.32677/yjm.v3i1.4547 |
|
Book (Personal Author) |
Author(s). Book title. Edition. Place of publication: Publisher; Year. |
Leung AK. Common Problems in Ambulatory Pediatrics: Symptoms and Signs. 1st ed. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2011. |
|
Chapter in an Edited Book |
Chapter author(s). Chapter title. In: Editor(s), ed(s). Book title. Place: Publisher; Year. p. xx–xx. |
Leung AK. Oral rehydration therapy and early refeeding in the management of childhood gastroenteritis. In: Overton LT, Ewente MR, eds. Child Nutrition Physiology. New York: Nova Biomedical Books; 2008. p. 127–152. |
|
Conference Proceedings |
Editor(s). Title. Proceedings of conference; date; location. Place: Publisher; Year. |
Harnden P, Joffe JK, Jones WG, editors. Germ Cell Tumors V. Proceedings of the 5th Germ Cell Tumour Conference; 2001 Sep 13–15; Leeds, UK. New York: Springer; 2002. |
|
Conference Paper |
Author(s). Paper title. In: Editor(s), editors. Conference title; date; location. Place: Publisher; Year. p. xx–xx. |
Christensen S, Oppacher F. An analysis of Koza's computational effort statistic for genetic programming. In: Foster JA, et al., editors. Genetic Programming. EuroGP 2002; 2002 Apr 3–5; Kinsdale, Ireland. Berlin: Springer; 2002. p. 182–191. |
|
Unpublished Material / Epub Ahead of Print |
Author(s). Title. Journal. Publication date. Note publication status. |
Rajindrajith S, Devanarayana NM, Benninga MA. Children and adolescents with chronic constipation: How many seek healthcare and what determines it? J Trop Pediatr. 2011 Dec 6. [Epub ahead of print]. |
|
Electronic Material (CD-ROM/Software) |
Title [medium]. Publisher/Producer; Year. Include version if applicable. |
Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) Training Aids [CD-ROM]. National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi; 2006. |
|
Computer Program |
Program title [computer program]. Version. Place: Publisher; Year. |
Hemodynamics III: The Ups and Downs of Hemodynamics [computer program]. Version 2.2. Orlando (FL): Computerized Educational Systems; 1993. |
|
Journal Article on the Internet |
Author(s). Article title. Journal [Internet]. Date [cited date]; volume(issue):pages. Available from: URL. |
Abood S. Quality improvement initiative in nursing homes: the ANA acts in an advisory role. Am J Nurs [Internet]. 2002 Jun [cited 2002 Aug 12];102(6):[about 1 p.]. Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/AJN/2002/june/Wawatch.htm |
|
Website/Homepage |
Organization or author. Website title [Internet]. Place: Publisher; copyright years [updated date; cited date]. Available from: URL. |
Cancer-Pain.org [Internet]. New York: Association of Cancer Online Resources, Inc.; c2000–01 [updated 2002 May 16; cited 2002 Jul 9]. Available from: http://www.cancer-pain.org/ |
|
Preprint |
Author(s). Title. Indicate that the work is a preprint. Include DOI or archive URL. Prefer the peer-reviewed version if available. |
Author(s). Title. Preprint. DOI/Archive URL. |
5. Tables:
- All tables must be positioned following the references in the main manuscript file.Tables must be cited within the main text in numerical order (for example, “Table 1” or “Tables 2”).
- Titles should be short but descriptive. Tables should be created in Microsoft Word with the tables tool with real rows and columns.
- Tables should be plain with no colors, shading, or graphics.
- Symbols and abbreviations should be defined immediately below the table, followed by an essential brief description.
6. Figures:
- Figures should be positioned after the references in the main manuscript file.
- It is essential that all figures are cited in the main text in sequential numerical order (for instance, “Figure 1” or “Figure 2”).
- Each figure must include a legend that elucidates its content, with the text formatted in “Times New Roman.”
- Multi-panel figures, which are labeled with parts such as a, b, c, d, etc., should be consolidated and submitted as a single file.
- To guarantee that all figures are made available as open access, authors are required to secure permission from the rights holder if they plan to utilize images that have been previously published in non-open-access journals.
All submissions must be in MS Word format, as this is the journal’s preferred file type. Manuscripts should be uploaded exclusively through the journal’s online submission system; we do not accept submissions by post.
For detailed instructions on how to submit your article, please visit our submission page: https://yemenjmed.com/submit_manuscript
If the corresponding author already has an account with the Yemen Journal of Medicine, they can log in directly and proceed with the submission. Authors who have not yet published with us and do not have an account will need to register first before submitting their manuscript. Kindly visit our registration page: https://yemenjmed.com/register
Once the submission is complete, the corresponding author will receive a manuscript number for use in all future communication regarding the paper.
Authors are requested to submit the following documents:
(a) A cover letter stating explicitly that the submitted work has not been published previously and is not currently under consideration by any other journal.
(b) A title page file including the following elements: the type of manuscript (such as an original article, review article, short communication, case report, or letter to the editor), the title of the manuscript, a short running title (limited to 50 characters), the names of all authors/contributors (along with their highest academic degrees, designations, and affiliations), the name(s) of the department(s) and/or institution(s) to which the work is attributed, and the details of the corresponding author, which should include their email address, and ORCID ID.
(c) The main Document (Manuscript) file, which must be anonymized—free of author names—and should include the complete text, references, tables, and figures.
|
Steps |
Action |
|
All manuscripts submitted to YJM will be scanned for plagiarism. Plagiarism is checked by the Plagiarism Checker X. Any submission identified with over 20% plagiarized content will be returned to the authors for revision to lower the plagiarism percentage or may be outright rejected. |
|
The manuscript first undergoes an initial assessment by the editor to determine whether it aligns with the journal’s scope and meets basic quality standards. If it does, it will be sent out for peer review. Manuscripts deemed unsuitable are rejected at this stage. |
|
Following editorial review, all manuscripts submitted to YJM—with the exception of editorials, letters to the editor, perspectives, and commentaries—undergo a double-blind peer-review process by at least two reviewers. Manuscripts are provided to reviewers anonymously, and feedback is sent anonymously to the corresponding author. Reviewers are expected to complete their assessments within four weeks, although delays may occur if appropriate reviewers are not immediately available. Authors are expected to respond appropriately to the comments received. In cases of conflicting recommendations from reviewers—for example, if one reviewer recommends acceptance or revision while another recommends rejection— a third reviewer will be invited to help making a decision. |
|
If revisions are requested, authors are given a reasonable timeframe to address the reviewers' comments and revise the manuscript accordingly. Upon resubmission, the revised manuscript undergoes further evaluation by the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor to ensure that the revisions adequately address the reviewers' concerns. |
|
The Editor-in-Chief or Associte Editor makes the final decision based on the revised manuscript and the authors' response to the reviewers' comments. Once accepted, manuscripts are prepared for publication, and authors are notified of the publication process. |
|
Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding authors through e-mail. They must carefully check and return the revised manuscripts within 72 hours. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to ensure that the galley proof is to be returned without delay with correction. In case of any delay, authors are responsible for the contents that appear in their published manuscripts. |
|
Online First articles are made available on the website prior to their inclusion in a journal issue and can be referenced and cited using their DOI. The YJM maintains a policy stating that no alterations will be permitted following the publication of an article, except in cases where an error has been attributed to the journal. |
|
Step |
Duration (Day)s |
|
Editor decision |
04 days |
|
Review time |
30 days |
|
Submission to acceptance |
40 days |
|
Acceptance to publication |
14 days |
The editor of the journal is a distinguished researcher within his or her area of expertise. Consequently, there exists a significant conflict of interest regarding the decision to submit an original research report as an author to his or her own journal. The editor seeks to implement a strategy for managing this conflict of interest and would appreciate the insights and guidance of COPE.
The central question pertains to the acceptability of editors publishing their own research in their journals; if deemed acceptable, it is imperative that the review process is both transparent and rigorous. Final decisions regarding the publication of such articles will be made by other members of the editorial board who do not have any conflicts of interest with the authors.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not eligible to be recognized as an author and should not be attributed as one. If AI contributed to the research or development of the paper, this involvement must be disclosed and clarified in the section detailing the tools or methodologies employed. All regulations regarding copyright and plagiarism remain in effect.
