Full HTML


Management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: An updated review

Nada Yusuf Khan

Author Affiliation

Consultant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asha’ab Obstetric Emergency Center, Aden, Yemen

Abstract

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy pose substantial risks to maternal and fetal health. Preeclampsia, a globally significant pregnancy complication associated with maternal mortality and adverse outcomes, is on the rise, driven by factors like obesity, advanced maternal age, and the increasing prevalence of underlying medical conditions. This review explores recent advancements in managing these conditions, extending the scope to encompass cases of hypertension during pregnancy and up to 12 weeks postpartum. Notably, chronic hypertension is now incorporated within the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy definition, with blood pressure assessment as a cornerstone in diagnosis. Emphasizing the importance of out-of-office blood pressure measurements, including ambulatory and home-based monitoring, is underscored for pregnant and non-pregnant women. Recent insights into preeclampsia and other hypertensive disorders in pregnancy have paved the way for enhanced preventive measures, screening protocols, and management strategies. With emerging early detection and intervention tools, there is significant potential for reshaping clinical practices.

DOI: 10.32677/yjm.v2i3.4358

Keywords: Chronic hypertension, Classification of hypertensive disorders, Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, Pre-eclampsia

Pages: 130-136

View: 4

Download: 4

DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.32677/yjm.v2i3.4358

Publish Date: 19-12-2023

Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy represents a significant challenge in maternal-fetal medicine. The understanding and management of these disorders have undergone a transformative journey over the years, reflecting the complexities involved in safeguarding maternal and fetal well-being. Historically, in Japan, the term "pregnancy toxemia" encompassed the triad of "hypertension," "proteinuria," and "edema" in its 1982 and 1984 definitions. However, the nomenclature shifted in 2005 to "pregnancy-induced hypertension." Subsequently, in 2018, Japan harmonized its classification with international standards, adopting the term "hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP)." HDP encompasses hypertension during pregnancy and up to 12 weeks postpartum [1]. Chronic hypertension antedating pregnancy is now encompassed within this definition. The pathophysiology of HDP remains multifaceted, with several hypotheses proposed, including the two-stage theory and the concept of angiogenesis imbalance. Additionally, investigating the levels of circulating angiogenic factors holds promise for preventing adverse outcomes in HDP [2]. 

Hypertension, the most prevalent medical complication during pregnancy, is a leading cause of maternal mortality in industrialized nations, with increasing prevalence [3]. Multiple factors, including maternal age, obesity, excessive gestational weight gain, and gestational diabetes, contribute to this rising trend. There are notable racial and ethnic disparities in HDP prevalence and associated mortality [4,5,6]. These disparities reflect broader systemic issues encompassing access to care and variations in social determinants of health rather than inherent physiological differences. This review provides a comprehensive update on the management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, addressing evolving definitions, diagnostic criteria, and disparities that underscore the contemporary landscape of HDP management.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) represent a significant global health concern, contributing to a substantial burden of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality [7]. These disorders are estimated to be responsible for 14% of maternal deaths worldwide, highlighting their profound impact on perinatal health. Despite variations in maternal mortality rates between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), HDP remains a leading cause of maternal death globally [8]. In HICs such as the UK and Ireland, HDP accounted for 2.8% of maternal deaths. At the same time, in the USA, they contributed to 7.4% of maternal deaths, emphasizing the widespread significance of these disorders. In LMICs, 10–15% of direct maternal deaths are associated with HDP, underscoring the need for comprehensive monitoring and intervention strategies [9]. The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 report provides a comprehensive overview of the global prevalence of HDP, revealing significant regional variations. Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East exhibit higher mean prevalences, with Africa having the highest prevalence at 334.9 per 100,000 women of childbearing age [10].

In contrast, the Western Pacific region reports the lowest prevalence at 16.4 per 100,000 women of childbearing age. Notably, a considerable disparity exists in the disease burden of HDP between HICs and LMICs, with a lower sociodemographic index (SDI) and human development index (HDI) associated with a greater disease burden. These findings underscore the need for targeted efforts to address HDP, particularly in regions with higher disease burdens and lower socioeconomic indices. Epidemiological trends also suggest a positive impact of interventions, with decreasing death and incidence rates in many countries, indicating progress in managing this critical health issue [11].

HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY (HDP)- Definition and classification

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are categorized into four types based on specific clinical criteria. Preeclampsia, occurring after 20 gestational weeks, involves hypertension along with proteinuria, organ damage, or uteroplacental dysfunction. Gestational hypertension, similar to preeclampsia, is characterized by hypertension alone after 20 gestational weeks. Superimposed preeclampsia, according to the Japan Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (JSSHP), entails hypertension accompanied by organ damage or proteinuria. Chronic hypertension encompasses cases where elevated blood pressure exists before conception, arises before 20 weeks gestation, or persists beyond 12 weeks post-delivery. This classification aids in precise diagnosis and targeted management, facilitating tailored interventions for improved maternal and fetal outcomes (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Classification of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. HTN=Hypertension

Chronic Hypertension

Chronic hypertension in pregnancy is a multifaceted condition characterized by elevated blood pressure that either predates conception, emerges before 20 weeks gestational age, or persists beyond 12 weeks post-delivery. As per the 2017 guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), elevated blood pressure is defined as a systolic blood pressure (BP) ranging from 120 to 129 mm Hg, with a diastolic BP below 80 mm Hg. Diagnosis of hypertension is established when the systolic BP reaches 130 mm Hg or higher or the diastolic BP is 80 mm Hg or higher, based on the average of two or more readings on two or more occasions [12]. Notably, the diagnostic criteria for hypertension by the ACC/AHA differ from those used in defining hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Chronic hypertension significantly impacts 1% to 5% of pregnancies, with this percentage expected to rise, attributed in part to an increase in the age of pregnant women and the growing prevalence of obesity [13]. The condition can be categorized into two types based on underlying pathophysiology: essential hypertension (primary hypertension) and secondary hypertension. Essential hypertension lacks an obvious cause, while secondary hypertension, constituting 10% to 15% of chronic hypertension cases, is associated with underlying processes like renal disease, aortic disease, collagen or vascular disease, and endocrinopathies [14].

Distinguishing chronic hypertension from gestational hypertension is crucial, especially concerning the time of elevated blood pressure detection. In chronic hypertension, elevated pressure is identified before 20 weeks gestation or persists postpartum, whereas gestational hypertension manifests after 20 weeks in a woman without preexisting hypertension [15]. Physiological changes during pregnancy, such as reduced vascular tone, can mask chronic hypertension, making recognition challenging. Chronic hypertension is linked to an increased risk of maternal and fetal complications, with the severity of blood pressure elevation correlating with the risk. Mild-to-moderate hypertension during pregnancy is typically considered when systolic BP ranges from 140 to 159 mm Hg, diastolic BP from 90 to 109 mm Hg, or both. Severe hypertension is defined as systolic pressure of 160 mm Hg or higher or diastolic pressure of 110 mm Hg or higher [16]. Notably, chronic hypertension without superimposed preeclampsia independently poses risks for perinatal death and small-for-gestational-age births. 

Gestational hypertension

Gestational hypertension, previously known as pregnancy-induced hypertension, is characterized by the onset of new hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation without meeting the diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia. This diagnosis is provisional and may transition to chronic hypertension if elevated blood pressure persists beyond 12 weeks postpartum. However, if blood pressure normalizes after this period, the diagnosis may be changed to transient hypertension of pregnancy. Gestational hypertension is observed in 6% to 17% of healthy nulliparous women and 2% to 4% of multiparous women. Of those initially diagnosed, 15% to 46% may progress to preeclampsia, with the risk inversely related to the gestational age at diagnosis [17].

Similar to chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension is categorized as mild or severe. Mild gestational hypertension is defined by a systolic BP of 140 to 159 mm Hg and a diastolic BP of 90 to 109 mm Hg on two separate occasions, at least 4 hours apart and within one week. In severe gestational hypertension, the systolic BP exceeds 160 mm Hg, and the diastolic BP is greater than 110 mm Hg. The lack of prenatal care can complicate the diagnosis, as factors like pain, anxiety, acute illness, and "white coat" hypertension in the emergency department can contribute to elevated blood pressure readings.

Outcomes differ significantly between non-severe and severe gestational hypertension. Non-severe cases are generally associated with favorable outcomes, while severe gestational hypertension carries a worse prognosis for both the mother and fetus. Monitoring and screening for preeclampsia and signs of end-organ dysfunction are crucial in pregnant women with suspected gestational hypertension. This includes a comprehensive assessment involving a review of systems, physical examination, ultrasound for fetal growth assessment, urinalysis, blood analysis, and tocodynamometry monitoring for fetal distress if necessary. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy recommends close monitoring of blood pressure twice weekly, along with weekly assessments of platelet count and liver enzymes in women diagnosed with gestational hypertension. Routine prescription of bed rest, a low-salt diet, or weight loss is not recommended, as these interventions have limited effects on end-organ dysfunction and the progression to preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is characterized by the onset of new-onset hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation, accompanied by proteinuria or evidence of end-organ dysfunction. The features of end-organ dysfunction include thrombocytopenia, liver or renal impairment, pulmonary edema, and neurologic or visual dysfunction. Preeclampsia can be classified as early-onset (before 34 weeks) or late-onset (at 34 weeks or later). Severe features include blood pressure greater than 160/100 mm Hg, acute kidney injury, liver function test abnormalities, CNS symptoms, platelet count less than 100 × 10^9 /L, and pulmonary edema.

The mechanism behind preeclampsia involves abnormal placentation and a dysfunctional maternal immune response. Abnormal invasion of fetal cytotrophoblasts leads to insufficient remodeling of spiral arteries, reducing placental perfusion. A systemic inflammatory response is initiated due to placental ischemia, resulting in endothelial dysfunction and systemic disturbances seen in preeclampsia. Risk factors for preeclampsia include a history of the condition, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes mellitus, high pre-pregnancy BMI, and assisted reproductive technology. Racial disparities exist, with African American women having a higher incidence and severity of preeclampsia [18,19].

HELLP syndrome considered a variant of severe preeclampsia, is characterized by hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets. It is associated with a greater degree of hepatic inflammation and activation of the complement and coagulation cascades. Eclampsia, defined as seizures in a pregnant woman with preeclampsia and no other identifiable cause, can occur during the antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum periods. Signs and symptoms preceding seizures include elevated blood pressure, headache, visual changes, and right upper quadrant and epigastric pain. More than 90% of eclampsia cases occur after 28 weeks gestation, with up to 44% in the postpartum period. Up to 25% of women with eclampsia report no preceding symptoms [20-22].

Chronic Hypertension with Superimposed Preeclampsia

It is a hypertensive disorder occurring in pregnant patients with preexisting chronic hypertension after 20 weeks gestation. This condition poses a higher risk of maternal and fetal complications compared to either chronic hypertension or preeclampsia alone. Diagnosis can be challenging as the patient's blood pressure is already elevated due to chronic hypertension, and the preexisting condition might have induced proteinuria. Suspicion for superimposed preeclampsia arises if there is an increase in blood pressure if the blood pressure becomes resistant to treatment, or if there is an escalation in the level of proteinuria. This hypertensive disorder underscores the complexity of managing pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension, requiring careful monitoring and timely interventions to mitigate risks. The overlap of chronic hypertension and preeclampsia necessitates vigilant attention to evolving symptoms and signs, emphasizing the importance of regular prenatal care and close collaboration between obstetricians and other healthcare providers. The management of Chronic Hypertension with Superimposed Preeclampsia typically involves a multidisciplinary approach to ensure optimal outcomes for both the mother and the fetus [15].

MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS IN PREGNANCY

Figure 2, summarizes the management plan of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Figure 2: Algorithm for management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. HTN=Hypertension, BID=Twice a day, TID=3 times a day, IV=Intravenous; BP=Blood pressure; 160/110 mmHg or above – severe HTN

Chronic hypertension in pregnancy

The management of chronic hypertension in pregnancy requires careful consideration, especially for women who may be taking antihypertensive drugs before conception or continue them during pregnancy. Certain antihypertensive medications like labetalol and methyldopa can be used safely in pregnancy. Nifedipine is safe if used after 20 weeks of pregnancy, while ACE inhibitors and  Angiotensin receptor blockers are contraindicated or not recommended during pregnancy. This emphasizes the need for a thorough understanding of the drug regimen (Table 1) [23,24]. It is crucial to assess the safety of the medications in use and make adjustments as necessary. For pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension, regular maternal reviews and strict blood pressure control form the cornerstone of management. During the first trimester, the physiological decrease in blood pressure may allow for a reduction or discontinuation of antihypertensive drug therapy. The goal is to maintain blood pressure within the range of 110–140/85 mmHg [25]. This optimal management approach not only focuses on controlling maternal blood pressure but also includes vigilant monitoring for the development of preeclampsia. This condition can complicate chronic hypertension in pregnancy [26].

Table 1: Safe and unsafe antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy

Close surveillance of fetal growth and well-being is essential, with attention to signs and symptoms that may indicate preeclampsia, such as headache, visual changes, epigastric or right upper quadrant pain, and edema. Regular blood pressure measurements, ideally using automated office or liquid crystal sphygmomanometers, are a key component of assessment [25]. Additionally, testing for proteinuria is crucial, and various methods, including dipstick urinalysis and spot urine protein: creatinine ratio, are employed. Dipstick urinalysis, while commonly used for screening, may require further evaluation with spot urine P/C (protein: creatinine) ratio if results indicate '1+' or more, as it is sensitive but less specific [25]. Incorporating home blood pressure monitoring into the assessment can enhance overall management strategies.

Gestational hypertension

The management of gestational hypertension requires vigilant monitoring and a tailored approach to ensure the well-being of both the mother and the fetus. Regular blood pressure monitoring is essential, with the goal of maintaining blood pressure within the range of 110–140/80–90 mmHg [25]. This ongoing assessment is crucial for detecting any deviations from the target range and enables timely intervention if needed. Regular evaluation for the development of preeclampsia is a key component of the management strategy. Close surveillance of fetal growth and well-being further enhances the comprehensive care provided to pregnant individuals with gestational hypertension. Once blood pressure is under control, outpatient care can be continued, with regular reviews to monitor the patient's condition closely.

For pregnant women with gestational hypertension, especially those without evidence of severe hypertension or progression to preeclampsia, outpatient management is deemed safe. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends regular in-office blood pressure monitoring, urine protein excretion assessments, and twice-weekly home blood pressure measurements. These measures, coupled with nonpharmacologic interventions, form a comprehensive approach to managing gestational hypertension. Nonpharmacologic interventions involve lifestyle modifications, including monitoring activity levels and adhering to a balanced diet. However, it is crucial to note that despite these interventions, up to 50% of women with gestational hypertension may progress to preeclampsia. In cases where gestational hypertension reaches severe-range blood pressures, initiation of antihypertensive therapy is recommended. Women in this category should be managed similarly to those with severe preeclampsia, emphasizing the importance of proactive and individualized care based on the severity of the condition [26-31].

Preeclampsia and preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension.

The management of preeclampsia, whether it is new onset or superimposed on chronic hypertension, demands a multidisciplinary approach to optimize outcomes for both the mother and the fetus, recognizing that delivery remains the only definitive cure. Striking a balance between the welfare of the growing fetus and the ongoing risk of maternal complications is crucial in this complex scenario. Specialized care at a center equipped with the necessary protocols and expertise is imperative, given that inpatient care is typically warranted.

In cases of severe hypertension associated with preeclampsia, urgent management is essential, necessitating the use of antihypertensive drugs for the rapid reduction of blood pressure (Table 2) [31]. Additionally, the consideration of an infusion of magnesium sulfate is warranted, as it has been shown to reduce the rate of seizures by 50% [32]. This comprehensive and specialized approach ensures that the complexities of preeclampsia, particularly when occurring in conjunction with chronic hypertension, are addressed with precision and urgency to safeguard the well-being of both the mother and the fetus.

Table 2: Safe antihypertensive drugs for urgent management of preeclampsia

Future health risks

Mothers who have encountered HDPs confront an increased likelihood of future health complications, including maternal myocardial infarction, heart failure, chronic hypertension, and stroke. Notably, the severity of preeclampsia, one of the common HDPs, demonstrates a positive correlation between the seriousness of cardiovascular diseases and an earlier onset of these conditions. This significant observation has led various professional organizations, such as the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, American Stroke Association, and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, to recognize preeclampsia as a clinical risk factor requiring screening during comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessments. Identifying HDPs early and delivering timely intervention is imperative, as a longer duration between diagnosis and treatment is associated with an escalated risk of maternal cardiovascular complications [33].

CONCLUSION

The management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy presents a multifaceted challenge, requiring a nuanced and comprehensive approach. Advances in diagnostic criteria, surveillance protocols, and intervention strategies have contributed to enhanced outcomes for both mothers and fetuses. The recognition of the long-term health implications for mothers who have experienced hypertensive disorders emphasizes the importance of early identification and intervention. The integration of out-of-office blood pressure monitoring, individualized care for different hypertensive conditions, and a multidisciplinary approach in severe cases underscore the strides made in reshaping clinical practices. Continuous research and collaborative efforts remain imperative to refine management strategies further and mitigate the global burden of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

References

  1. Watanabe K, Matsubara K, Nakamoto O, et al. Outline of the new definition and classification of "Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy(HDP)": a revised JSSHP statement of 2005. Hypertens Res Pregnancy. 2018;6:33–7.
  2. Ngene NC, Moodley J. Role of angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis and management of preeclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;141:5–13.
  3. Collier AY, Molina RL. Maternal Mortality in the United States: Updates on Trends, Causes, and Solutions. Neoreviews. 2019 Oct;20(10):e561-e574.
  4. Singh GK, Siahpush M, Liu L, et al. Racial/Ethnic, Nativity, and Sociodemographic Disparities in Maternal Hypertension in the United States, 2014-2015. International journal of hypertension. 2018;2018:7897189.
  5. Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, et al. Vital Signs: Pregnancy-Related Deaths, United States, 2011-2015, and Strategies for Prevention, 13 States, 2013-2017. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2019;68(18):423–429.
  6. Miller EC, Zambrano Espinoza MD, Huang Y, et al. Maternal Race/Ethnicity, Hypertension, and Risk for Stroke During Delivery Admission. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020;9(3):e014775.
  7. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet. Global health. 2014;2(6):e323–e333.
  8. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, et al. Preeclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376:631–44.
  9. Knight M, Nair M, Tuffnell D, et al, editors on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving lives, improving mothers' care: lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013–15. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2017.
  10. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-22.
  11. Wang W, Xie X, Yuan T, et al. Epidemiological trends of maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at the global, regional, and national levels: a population-based study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2021;21(1):1-10.
  12. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1269-1324.
  13. Sibai BM, Koch MA, Freire S, et al. The impact of prior preeclampsia on the risk of superimposed preeclampsia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic
  14. Malha L, August P. Secondary hypertension in pregnancy. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17(7):53.
  15. Seely EW, Ecker J. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Circulation. 2014;129(11): 1254–61.
  16. Khosravi S, Dabiran S, Lotfi M, et al. Study of the prevalence of hypertension and complications of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014 Nov 24;4(11):860-7.
  17. Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102(1):181–92.
  18. Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, et al. High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016 Apr 19;353:i1753.
  19. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for preeclampsia: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Jama. 2017 Apr 25;317(16):1661-7.
  20. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis, and management recommendations for international practice. Hypertension. 2018 Jul;72(1):24-43.
  21. Leeman L, Dresang LT, Fontaine P. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 2016;93(2):121–7.
  22. McDermott M, Miller EC, Rundek T, et al. Preeclampsia: association with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and stroke. Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):524-30.
  23. Briggs G, Freeman R, Towers C, et al. Drugs in pregnancy and lactation, 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
  24. Metoki H, Iwama N, Hamada H, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement. Hypertension Research. 2022 Aug;45(8):1298-309.
  25. Beech A, Mangos G. Management of hypertension in pregnancy. Australian Prescriber. 2021 Oct;44(5):148.
  26. Raman R, Devaramane R, Jagadish GM, et al. Various imaging manifestations of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Polish Journal of Radiology. 2017 Feb 7;82:64-70.
  27. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al.International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertens 2018;13:291-310.
  28. Lowe SA, Bowyer L, Lust K, et al. SOMANZ guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 2014. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015 Oct;55(5):e1-29.
  29. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:1492-5.
  30. Spiro L, Scemons D. Management of Chronic and Gestational Hypertension of Pregnancy: A Guide for Primary Care Nurse Practitioners. Open Nurs J. 2018 Aug 31;12:180-183.
  31. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133(1):e1–25.
  32. Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do Women With Preeclampsia and Their Babies Benefit From Magnesium Sulfate? The Magpie Trial: A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2002 Nov 1;57(11):719-21.
  33. Rosenbloom JI, Lewkowitz AK, Lindley KJ, et al. Expectant management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and future cardiovascular morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;135(1):27-35.