Vaccine Mandate Removal in Florida and the Global Consequences of Political Pseudoscience

Brian N. Fink¹

Author Affiliation

1 Professor, Department of Population Health, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH, USA

Abstract

NO ABSTRACT

DOI: 10.63475/yjm.v4i3.0206

Pages: 489-491

View: 5

Download: 8

DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.63475/yjm.v4i3.0206

Publish Date: 31-12-2025

Full Text

In September, two events unfolded in the United States that should alarm health professionals worldwide. In Florida, Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo announced the state will eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates, calling them “immoral” and likening them to “slavery.” [1] Concurrently, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testified before Congress, reiterating his long-debunked claim from his 2005 “Deadly Immunity” article that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is linked to autism. [2] Despite overwhelming scientific consensus disproving this claim, including large-scale studies in Denmark, the United States, and elsewhere, the myth persists,

largely due to his influence and media amplification. [3–5] His position lends institutional weight to misinformation. In recent months, he replaced the entire Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), [6] fired Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Susan Monarez for prioritizing “evidence over ideology,” [7] and narrowed access to COVID-19 vaccines. [8] These actions are not bureaucratic adjustments; they reflect an ideological project to redefine the purpose and scope of public health. They signal a coordinated erosion of public health and medical infrastructure—one with implications far beyond American borders. The core concern is not merely the rollback of mandates or the revival of vaccine myths, but the normalization of pseudoscience within the highest levels of government and the global consequences of that shift.

The decision by Florida to eliminate vaccine mandates marks a departure from decades of evidence-based policy. Since the 1980s, every state has required immunizations for schoolchildren to prevent outbreaks of diseases like measles, polio, and pertussis. [9] These mandates have contributed to the prevention of over 500 million illnesses and more than 1 million deaths among children born between 1994 and 2003.[10] As with the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to return abortion policy to the states, the policy move in Florida may trigger a cascade of similar actions elsewhere. If additional states follow suit, the result will be predictable: increased susceptibility to outbreaks, diminished herd immunity, and heightened vulnerability during future pandemics. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated how quickly infectious diseases can cross borders; weakening domestic immunization infrastructure has international consequences. Surgeon General Ladapo did not frame his announcement as a public health reform but as a moral stand against “medical orthodoxy.” By casting mandates as violations of bodily autonomy and religious freedom, he aligns public health measures with authoritarian overreach. This reframing undermines trust in medical institutions and fuels resistance to collective health action.

Although these events are unfolding domestically, their implications will be global. Vaccine hesitancy is a transnational phenomenon, and political figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have international platforms. The World Health Organization has identified vaccine hesitancy as one of the top ten threats to global health. [11] When the United States begins to institutionalize anti-vaccine rhetoric, it can embolden similar movements in other countries, particularly those with populist governments. American exemption rates in the United States are rising, including the nonmedical exemption rate of Florida, exceeding 5%, well above the national average.[12] If replicated, such policies could reverse decades of progress in disease prevention and destabilize global health security. The key is to strengthen global resilience against vaccine misinformation. The following are concrete strategies that can positively impact people around the world.

Addressing vaccine misinformation and hesitancy requires more than reactive fact-checking. It demands structural, communication, and policy interventions that operate across borders. Several evidence-informed strategies can help rebuild trust and strengthen global immunization systems.

Build Proactive, Trusted Communication Networks

Trusted messengers, including clinicians, community health workers, and local leaders, are consistently more effective than national authorities in shaping vaccine attitudes. [13] Narrative-based communication, which pairs data with personal stories, improves message retention and reduces hesitancy.[14] Countries should also establish rapidresponse communication teams capable of monitoring emerging misinformation and responding within hours.

Strengthen Digital Governance and Platform Accountability

Digital misinformation spreads faster than public health agencies can respond. Collaborations with social media platforms to reduce algorithmic amplification of false claims, increase transparency, and elevate authoritative sources have shown promise.[15] Digital literacy programs, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, help individuals identify misinformation and evaluate sources.[16]

Reinforce Immunization Infrastructure

Reliable access to vaccines is foundational to trust. Investments in routine immunization systems, cold-chain capacity, and community-based delivery models reduce logistical barriers and normalize vaccination as part of routine care. [17] Integrating vaccination with other health services increases uptake and reduces missed opportunities.[18]

Engage With Communities Rather Than Correct Them

Two-way dialogue is more effective than top-down messaging. Community engagement strategies, including listening sessions, town halls, and partnerships with religious and cultural leaders, address the specific fears and narratives driving hesitancy. [19] Transparency about uncertainty and evolving evidence strengthens credibility.[20]

Protect Public Health Institutions From Political Interference

Scientific independence is essential for maintaining public trust. Legal safeguards that protect national immunization advisory committees from political dismissal, along with international coordination to support countries facing political pressure, help preserve evidence-based decisionmaking.[21]

Expand Global Surveillance and Early Warning Systems

Cross-border disease surveillance and genomic monitoring enable rapid detection of outbreaks linked to declining vaccination rates. [22] World Health Organization (WHO) and regional bodies increasingly track misinformation trends as early indicators of potential drops in immunization coverage.[23]

Make Vaccination the Easy, Default Choice

Behavioral insights, such as default appointments, reminders, and simplified consent processes, significantly increase vaccine uptake. [24] Reducing financial and logistical barriers, including transportation costs and limited clinic hours, further improves access. School-based vaccination programs remain among the most effective global strategies. [25]

Physicians, health care providers, and public health professionals must respond with both evidence and storytelling. The success of the HHS Secretary and Florida Surgeon General lies in their ability to frame public health as coercive, elitist, and disconnected from everyday experience. Countering this requires narratives that highlight collective protection: children spared from disability and death, communities strengthened by shared responsibility, and the moral imperative of preventing preventable disease. This is not a call for censorship or political retaliation. It is a call for clarity, courage, and communication. Science is not ideology. Mandates are not tyranny. Protecting children from preventable disease is not a partisan act; it is a moral one.

DISCLAIMER

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author. The author has given final approval for the publication of this version in the Yemen Journal of Medicine and assumes responsibility for all aspects of the work.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

References

1. Burke M. Florida surgeon general says state will eliminate all vaccine mandates. NBC News. 2025 Sep 3 [cited 2025 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.nbcnews. com/health/health-news/florida-surgeon-general-saysstate-will-eliminate-vaccine-mandates-rcna228835

2. United States Congressional Record. Deadly immunity. Cong Rec. 2005;151(10):13935–13938. [cited 2025 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ CRECB-2005-pt10/html/CRECB-2005-pt10-Pg13935-3.htm

3. Madsen KM, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, Schendel D, Wohlfahrt J, Thorsen P, et al. A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(19):1477-1482.

4. Hviid A, Hansen JV, Frisch M, Melbye M. Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination and autism: A nationwide cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(8):513-520.

5. Taylor LE, Swerdfeger AL, Eslick GD. Vaccines are not associated with autism: An evidence-based metaanalysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine. 2014;32(29):3623-3629.

6. Ungar L, Seitz A. RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine advisory committee. Associated Press. 2025 Jun 9. [cited 2025 Oct 9]. Available from: https://apnews.com/article/kennedycdc-acip-vaccines-3790c89f45b6314c5c7b686db0e3a8f9

7. Yousif N. Fired CDC director says RFK ‘weaponising public health’ as more leaders quit agency. BBC News. 2025 Aug 28. [cited 2025 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www. bbc.com/news/articles/cwy3zjxy3dwo

8. Stein R. RFK Jr. says COVID shots no longer recommended for kids, pregnant women. NPR. 2025 May 27. [cited 2025 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.npr.org/sections/ shots-health-news/2025/05/27/nx-s1-5413179/covidvaccine-children-pregnant-rfk-cdc

9. Mayo Clinic. History of vaccine requirements and vaccine research highlights. 2021 Dec 31. [cited 2025 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseasesconditions/history-disease-outbreaks-vaccine-timeline/ requirements-research

10. Zhou F, Jatlaoui TC, Leidner AJ, Carter RJ, Dong X, Santoli JM, et al. Health and economic benefits of routine childhood immunizations in the era of the Vaccines for Children program - United States, 1994-2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024;73(31):682-685.

11. World Health Organization. Ten threats to global health in 2019. 2019 Dec 31. [cited 2025 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threatsto-global-health-in-2019

12. Reed T, Reyes Y. Florida kindergartners lead Southeast in vaccine opt-outs. Axios Tampa Bay. 2025 Aug 19. [cited 2025 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.axios.com/ local/tampa-bay/2025/08/19/florida-kindergartnerssoutheast-vaccine-exemption

13. Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Rothman AJ, Leask J, Kempe A. Increasing vaccination: Putting psychological science into action. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017;18(3): 149-207.

14. Betsch C, Böhm R, Korn L. Inviting patients to narrate improves vaccine acceptance. Health Psychol. 2013; 32(7):701-704.

15. Broniatowski DA, Jamison AM, Qi S, AlKulaib L, Chen T, Benton A, et al. Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(10):1378-1384.

16. Guess A, Nagler J, Tucker J. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Sci Adv. 2019;5(1):eaau4586.

17. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Immunization supply chain strategy. 2021. Gavi Immunisation Supply Chain Strategy (iSC) for 2021–2025. https://www.gavi.org/sites/ default/files/about/Strategy/Gavi-ISC-Strategy-TOC. png. September 03, 2025.

18. Planning Guide to Reduce Missed Opportunities for Vaccination. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/ bitstreams/fe138fd6-6e14-4b05-a2a2-1955cead96b2/ content. September 03, 2025.

19. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Eckersberger E, Smith DM, Paterson P. Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: A systematic review of published literature, 2007-2012. Vaccine. 2014; 32(19):2150-2159.

20. Omer SB, Yildirim I, Forman HP. Herd immunity and implications for SARS-CoV-2 control. JAMA. 2020; 324(20):2095-2096.

21. Attwell K, Navin MC, Lopalco PL, Jestin C, Reiter S, Omer SB. Recent vaccine mandates in the United States, Europe and Australia: A comparative study. Vaccine. 2018;36(48):7377-7384.

22. Gardy JL, Loman NJ. Towards a genomics-informed, real-time, global pathogen surveillance system. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(1):9-20.

23. Wilson SL, Wiysonge C. Social media and vaccine hesitancy. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e004206.

24. Milkman KL, Patel MS, Gandhi L, Graci HN, Gromet DM, Ho H, et al. A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor’s appointment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(20):e2101165118.

25. Abad N, Baack BN, Omer SB. School-based vaccination programs: An overview. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;32(1): 44-51.

---